Author Topic: No swivel trace  (Read 51654 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline REEFMAN

  • Ultimate Champ
  • ****
  • Posts: 9766
  • Cred: 768
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Jozi
No swivel trace
« on: June 28, 2010, 01:10:36 PM »
No swivel Trace
.

Offline riaandl

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Cred: 1
  • Location: Patensie Eastern Cape
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 04:45:08 PM »
use the same trace when scratching for blactails, the only difference is that I don't cut the line but simply fold the two pieces together and puch the though the hooks eye and over the bend and pull it tight.

Offline Ziggy

  • Grunter hunter - Ultimate photoshopper
  • Ultimate Champ
  • ****
  • Posts: 1672
  • Cred: 182
  • Gender: Male
  • Teeth that bite!
  • Location: Durban
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2010, 05:07:37 PM »
Is that 2 overhand knots - or is it two turns in one knot? Cany you use a figure of 8 knot instead (like when you are making loops for connecting your leader to tippet on a fly rod?)

Offline REEFMAN

  • Ultimate Champ
  • ****
  • Posts: 9766
  • Cred: 768
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Jozi
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2010, 05:28:58 PM »
Is that 2 overhand knots - or is it two turns in one knot? Cany you use a figure of 8 knot instead (like when you are making loops for connecting your leader to tippet on a fly rod?)

The pic says "Overhand knot x2" ie: 2 overhand knots - there is no simpler knot than an overhand. Why complicate things with a fig 8?

Offline abloke

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Cred: 0
  • Location: Victoria,Australia
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2011, 04:01:22 AM »
That's a pretty simple way of tying droppers.Just wondering about the strength of the knots?..I normally tie twisted dropper knots but they're a bit more mucking around.Will have to try these out.

Thanks,Darren :tite

MikeF

  • Guest
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2011, 01:52:24 PM »
Dont worry about the strength of those knots, you arent catching sharks with that trace. I have made my traces like that for years when I fished R&S and caught many large blacktail and some other species on a trace like that.

Offline abloke

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Cred: 0
  • Location: Victoria,Australia
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2011, 02:03:42 PM »
Thanks!..seems to be the go for catching bait and smaller food fish up to a few pounds in weight. :sml:

Offline John F

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6563
  • Cred: 522
  • Gender: Male
  • Virtus et Honos
  • Location: Maputo - Mozambique
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2011, 05:52:46 PM »
That's the way I make my traces for bottoms... never had a problem! Getting 2 x 5 kg fish sometimes!
Acecraft 660 DV
Yeld cat 19 (Sold)
Gemini 520 Crusader (Sold)

Offline rofflign

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
  • Cred: 5
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melkbosstrand
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2011, 08:19:37 AM »
don't forget to make a knot in the sinker line to weaken it.

Offline Kumz

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Cred: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2011, 08:54:30 AM »
 (clap) Perfect Scratching trace ....  :win:


Caught this baby on a trace like that ...

Offline Toppie

  • RIP Toppie. What a great man. You will always be an
  • Ultimate Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Cred: 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Pretoria
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2011, 09:12:40 AM »
Been fishing (scratching & bottoms) with that trace since I was a laaitie and it has always worked for me. Just make sure your mainline is strong/thick enough to withstand abrasive teeth.
"Everything will be good in the end" - so it cant be the end yet!

Offline REEFMAN

  • Ultimate Champ
  • ****
  • Posts: 9766
  • Cred: 768
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Jozi
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2011, 02:03:44 PM »
Doc has improved this trace...

instead of using overhand knots, replace them with Spider Hitches... much stronger!



Offline craigb

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 321
  • Cred: 13
  • i just wanna fish
  • Location: durban
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2011, 07:16:48 PM »
Hi guys.That trace is very simple and easy to do.Caught many fish on it including Brusher.Its the only trace my wife will use since I taught her it.I also don't cut the line but push it through the hook eye and over again,makes it stronger and also easy for hook change.
I'm not addicted to fishing,i can quit anytime my wife makes me.

Offline Werries

  • Ultimate member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Cred: 84
  • Location: Pretoria
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2011, 07:04:05 AM »
Doc has improved this trace...

instead of using overhand knots, replace them with Spider Hitches... much stronger!



Now This one I like!!!  :win: Thanx Reefs/Doc
Only dead fish go with the flow...

Offline Andre Laas

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Cred: 24
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Westville, Durban
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2011, 09:17:23 AM »
I use the same basic trace as Doc's modified one with three differences
 
1. I use figure 8 knots
 
2. I make the two hook snoots equal lengths - between 10cm (rocks/rough seas) and 30cm (sand/calm seas)
 
2. I use the trace in reverse as to the illustration.... that way the hooks snoots stand away from the line and has a bit more movement in the water. Thus I tie an attachment Loop where the sinker is in the illustration and a sinker loop on the opposite side.
 
I then use a snap swivel on my main line so that I can change between traces (different hook sizes / snoot lengths) as necessary. This also allows me to quickly switch to spoon when the shad comes on the bite.

Offline japie

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Cred: 1
  • Location: Pretoria, Gauteng
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2011, 07:44:50 AM »
Great Idea Critter (fester)

Offline REEFMAN

  • Ultimate Champ
  • ****
  • Posts: 9766
  • Cred: 768
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Jozi
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2011, 08:08:09 AM »
I use the same basic trace as Doc's modified one with three differences
 
1. I use figure 8 knots
 
2. I make the two hook snoots equal lengths - between 10cm (rocks/rough seas) and 30cm (sand/calm seas)
 
2. I use the trace in reverse as to the illustration.... that way the hooks snoots stand away from the line and has a bit more movement in the water. Thus I tie an attachment Loop where the sinker is in the illustration and a sinker loop on the opposite side.
 
I then use a snap swivel on my main line so that I can change between traces (different hook sizes / snoot lengths) as necessary. This also allows me to quickly switch to spoon when the shad comes on the bite.

Draw us a pic Critter?

Offline Andre Laas

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Cred: 24
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Westville, Durban
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2011, 08:18:10 AM »
Will take some pictures over the week-end and post them Monday.....
« Last Edit: August 27, 2011, 05:23:52 PM by Critter »

Offline KING-GT

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 126
  • Cred: 28
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Centurion
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2011, 07:47:09 AM »
Dnt under estimate this trace. Pulled a 17kg blue ray and a diamond close to 40kg on this trace while scratchn for sandies... Bullet proof with the hitches...

Offline deezynking

  • Ultimate Chancer
  • Ultimate member
  • ***
  • Posts: 930
  • Cred: 15
  • Gender: Male
  • Feeesshhhhh
  • Location: durban kzn
Re: No swivel trace
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2011, 02:25:36 PM »
never had a problem with the hitches.... picked up fish up to 7kilos on this and never had a problem.
i normally use a car spark plug sinker wen scratching in the rocks
 

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal